Legal Opinion
Zoltek Corp. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided April 12, 2006No. 96-166 CPublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
DAMICH, Chief Judge.
I. Introduction
Pending before the Court is the Motion for Sanctions by Zoltek Corp. (“Zoltek”). In its motion, Zoltek asserts that the government failed to amend its responses to Zoltek’s First and Second Sets of Interrogatories (specifically Interrogatories Nos. 3 and 11) and its First and Second Requests for Production of Documents (specifically Requests for Production Nos. 1-5, 9, 10, and 12) as required by Rule 26(e)(2) of the Rules of the U.S. Court of Federal Claims (“RCFC”) by not providing the declaration of Mr. James F. Moraveck, and attachments…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Yeti by Molly Ltd. v. Deckers Outdoor Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Southern States Rack and Fixture, Incorporated v. Sherwin-Williams Company, and Keller Rigging & Construction Sc, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2003
- Woodworker's Supply, Inc. v. Principal Mutual Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
- Lori David v. Caterpillar, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- United Medical Supply Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
- Lakeland Partners, L.L.C. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
- K-Con Building Systems, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- American Federal Bank, FSB v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
- Hanover Insurance Company (The) v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.