Legal Opinion
Securiforce International America, LLC v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided July 12, 2016No. 12-759CPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RCFC 37; Motion to Compel Discovery and for Payment of Expenses; Motion for Sanctions; Adequacy of 30(b)(6) Witness.
OPINION.HORN, J.
FINDINGS OF FACT
Plaintiff, Securiforce International America, LLC (Securiforce), filed two separate motions under Rule 37 of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims (RCFC) (2015) 1 during the extended and difficult discovery in this case. Plaintiff filed a motion to compel discovery and for payment of expenses under RCFC 37(a) on May 31, 2013, after defendant did not produce to plaintiff, in response to plaintiffs document production requests,…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Societe Internationale Pour Participations Industrielles Et Commerciales, S. A. v. RogersSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- San Carlos Irrigation and Drainage District v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989
- bell/heery v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
- Chemical Engineering Corporation and John O. McLean v. Essef Industries, Inc. And Willard StutzmanCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Securiforce International America, LLC v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018
- 3rd Eye Surveillance, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2022
- Giesecke & Devrient Gmbh v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2025
- Giesecke & Devrient Gmbh v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2024
- Hardy v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.