Legal Opinion

City of Dallas v. Priolo

Texas Supreme Court

Decided July 18, 1951No. A-2950PublishedCited by 74 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Hickman

The City of Dallas condemned a strip of land approximately 30 x 60 feet to extend and widen Dolphin Road at Haskell Avenue. The strip condemned was the open space between the old street line and the front entrance of a building owned by respondent Priolo and occupied and used by him as a grocery store and liquor store. The condemned portion provided seven head-in parking places in front of his liquor and grocery stores. In answer to special issues the jury found that the market *425value of the part taken was $1,200.00; that the market value of the part not taken was $30,000.00 before the taking,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. G., C. & S. F. R'y Co. v. FullerTexas Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Isbell v. LennoxTexas Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Cox, Inc. v. Humble Oil & Refining Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1929
  4. Milam County v. AkersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1944
  5. City of Dallas v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1933

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by74 opinions

  1. State v. Central Expressway Sign AssociatesTexas Supreme Court · 2009
  2. State v. SchmidtTexas Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Ranger Insurance Co. v. RogersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1975
  4. Felts v. Harris CountyTexas Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Strayhorn v. JonesTexas Supreme Court · 1957

69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API