Legal Opinion

Felts v. Harris County

Texas Supreme Court

Decided March 7, 1996No. 94-1017PublishedCited by 55 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ENOCH, Justice.

This is an inverse condemnation case which questions whether property owners have a right to compensation under Article I, Section 17 of the Texas Constitution for damage to their property resulting from roadway traffic noise. Because the Feltses have not established a constitutionally compensable damage, we affirm the judgment of the court of appeals, but for reasons different from those that court expressed.

In 1978, the Feltses purchased a half-acre lot in Cypress, Texas and built their home. Nine years later, Harris County decided to build North Eldridge Parkway, a four-lane…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. State v. CarpenterTexas Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Westgate, Ltd. v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  3. State v. HaleTexas Supreme Court · 1941
  4. DuPuy v. City of WacoTexas Supreme Court · 1965
  5. State v. SchmidtTexas Supreme Court · 1994

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by55 opinions

  1. Texas Department of Transportation v. City of Sunset ValleyTexas Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Interstate Northborough Partnership v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Texas Parks & Wildlife Department v. Callaway, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1998
  4. Loyd v. ECO Resources, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1997
  5. City of Austin v. Travis County Landfill Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2002

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API