Legal Opinion
Isbell v. Lennox
Texas Supreme Court
Decided June 4, 1927No. 3551PublishedCited by 96 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Pierson
The nature of the case is sufficiently disclosed by the following brief statement of the case by the Honorable Court of Civil Appeals:
“This was a suit by appellants against appellees for damages they claimed they had suffered as a result, they charged, of the act of appellees in so diverting water from its natural course on their land as to cause same to flow upon and injure appellants’ land. In their petition appellants alleged that the diversion was of surface water and of the waters of Boggy Creek, a tributary of Lankford Creek, by means of a dam and levee appellees constructed on their…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Gulf, Texas & Western Railway Co. v. DickeyTexas Supreme Court · 1916
- Walker v. HaleyTexas Supreme Court · 1919
- Hendrick v. Blount-Decker Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1917
- Isbell v. LennoxCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920
- City of Ft. Worth v. AshleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by96 opinions
- City of Dallas v. PrioloTexas Supreme Court · 1951
- Harris v. Thornton's Department StoreCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936
- Southern Underwriters v. SchoolcraftTexas Supreme Court · 1942
- International-Great Northern R. v. AckerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
- Norwich Union Indemnity Co. v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
91 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.