Legal Opinion

McDaniel v. Fordham

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 18, 1964No. 167PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDenny, C.J.

This appeal presents two questions for consideration and determination. (1) Do the plaintiffs in their complaint attempt to en- graft a parol trust on a prospective inheritance? (2) Is there a misjoinder of parties and causes of action?

In this jurisdiction an express trust may be impressed on land by a parol agreement accompanying the conveyance of the legal title. Taylor v. Addington, 222 N.C. 393, 23 S.E. 2d 318; Peele v. LeRoy, 222 N.C. 123, 22 S.E. 2d 244; Wilson v. Jones, 176 N.C. 205, 97 S.E. 18; Anderson v. Harrington, 163 N.C. 140, 79 S.E. 426; Blackburn v. Blackburn, 109 N.C. 488, 13…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Leach v. . PageSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
  2. Virginia-Carolina Chemical Co. v. FloydSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
  3. Carlisle v. . CarlisleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  4. State v. . McCanlessSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  5. Riggs v. . SwannSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1860

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bingham v. LeeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  2. McDaniel v. FordhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  3. Barnes v. BarnesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API