McDaniel v. Fordham
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtDenny, C.J.
This appeal presents two questions for consideration and determination. (1) Do the plaintiffs in their complaint attempt to en- graft a parol trust on a prospective inheritance? (2) Is there a misjoinder of parties and causes of action?
In this jurisdiction an express trust may be impressed on land by a parol agreement accompanying the conveyance of the legal title. Taylor v. Addington, 222 N.C. 393, 23 S.E. 2d 318; Peele v. LeRoy, 222 N.C. 123, 22 S.E. 2d 244; Wilson v. Jones, 176 N.C. 205, 97 S.E. 18; Anderson v. Harrington, 163 N.C. 140, 79 S.E. 426; Blackburn v. Blackburn, 109 N.C. 488, 13…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Leach v. . PageSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
- Virginia-Carolina Chemical Co. v. FloydSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
- Carlisle v. . CarlisleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
- State v. . McCanlessSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
- Riggs v. . SwannSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1860
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Bingham v. LeeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
- McDaniel v. FordhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
- Barnes v. BarnesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969