Legal Opinion
Rae v. County of Suffolk
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided March 5, 2010No. 07-CV-2738 (RRM)(ARL)PublishedCited by 45 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM & ORDER
MAUSKOPF, District Judge.
Plaintiff Thomas Rae brings this action under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983 and 1988 alleging that Defendants the County of Suffolk (the “County”), the Suffolk County Police Department (the “SCPD”), Patrick Stewart, George Yoight, John Does # 1-5, and Richard Dormer, Suffolk County Police Commissioner (collectively, the “County Defendants”), and Tracey Anne Barry-Rae, violated his rights under the United States Constitution by falsely arresting him and maliciously prosecuting him for the alleged rape of his estranged wife, Defendant Barry-Rae. 1 Plaintiff also…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- Carthew v. County of SuffolkDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2010
- Soto v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2015
- Weiner v. McKeeferyDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2015
- Faiaz v. Colgate UniversityDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2014
- Perez v. PonteDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2017
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.