Legal Opinion

Reynolds v. First Alabama Bank of Montgomery

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 19, 1985No. 83-70 to 83-72PublishedCited by 91 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is the third time beneficiaries of trusts held by First Alabama Bank of Montgomery, N.A., have come to us asking to be made whole, their claims being occasioned by the imprudent investments made by their paid trustee.1

On remand, the beneficiaries were able to obtain a judgment in the amount of $5,753,747.00 and the beneficiaries' attorneys were awarded a fee of one-third of that amount, or $1,795,200.00. The guardian ad litem was awarded a fee of $7,200.00. The beneficiaries' attorneys filed a motion to require the bank to pay these fees because trial judge Hooper's decree of August 19,…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Mills v. Electric Auto-Lite Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Sprague v. Ticonic National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  5. Hall v. ColeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by91 opinions

  1. City of Bessemer v. McClainSupreme Court of Alabama · 2006
  2. Brown v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990
  3. Bowling v. Ansted Chrysler-Plymouth-Dodge, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1992
  4. First Alabama Bank Of Montgomery, N.A. v. First State Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
  5. Ex Parte HornSupreme Court of Alabama · 1998

86 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API