Legal Opinion

Amended Opinion Vincent Ray Willis v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 13, 1980No. 78-2361PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALLACE, Circuit Judge:

Willis appeals from the denial of his motion for post-conviction relief filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. He and co-defendant Evanoff were convicted of possession of marijuana with intent to distribute, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). Willis contends that he was denied effective assistance of counsel because he and Evanoff were represented by members of the same law firm. 1 Specifically, Willis argues that he should be granted a new trial because conflict of interest prevented his attorney from presenting his most effective defense and because the trial judge…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Holloway v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. William Foxworth v. Louie L. Wainwright, Director, Division of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
  4. Harold L. Peek, Jr., and Susanna E. Peek v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
  5. United States v. William Sheiner and Victor Piacentile, A/K/A Victor PeaseCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. United States v. Gary HalbertCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
  2. Karen Sue Morris v. State of California Ventura County Municipal Court Attorney General of the State of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  3. Maxwell v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  4. United States v. Crespo de LlanoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  5. State v. VegaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API