Amended Opinion Vincent Ray Willis v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
WALLACE, Circuit Judge:
Willis appeals from the denial of his motion for post-conviction relief filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. He and co-defendant Evanoff were convicted of possession of marijuana with intent to distribute, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). Willis contends that he was denied effective assistance of counsel because he and Evanoff were represented by members of the same law firm. 1 Specifically, Willis argues that he should be granted a new trial because conflict of interest prevented his attorney from presenting his most effective defense and because the trial judge…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Holloway v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- William Foxworth v. Louie L. Wainwright, Director, Division of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
- Harold L. Peek, Jr., and Susanna E. Peek v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
- United States v. William Sheiner and Victor Piacentile, A/K/A Victor PeaseCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- United States v. Gary HalbertCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- Karen Sue Morris v. State of California Ventura County Municipal Court Attorney General of the State of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Maxwell v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- United States v. Crespo de LlanoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- State v. VegaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.