Maxwell v. Superior Court
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
NEWMAN, J.
One due process requirement is that an individual charged with serious crime be represented by competent and independent counsel. Another is that courts generally must not interfere with defendant’s informed conclusions as to how his defense ought to be conducted. In this lawsuit, which involves an indigent defendant accused of capital murder, those two requirements appear to conflict; and we must decide which one commands more deference.
*610The precise issue is whether the trial court erred when, notwithstanding petitioner’s protest, it recused his retained counsel and appointed…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Cuyler v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Holloway v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by98 opinions
- People v. DoolinCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
- People v. FryeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
- People v. DanielsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- People v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- People v. BelmontesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
93 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.