Legal Opinion

Borum v. Graham

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 1, 1935No. Civ. 9116PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILLIS, J., pro tem.

The appeal herein is from the judgment after verdict by a jury, from an order denying a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict and from an order denying a motion for new trial. The appeal from the latter order, being unauthorized, will be dismissed.

Appellant assigns as error orders overruling a demurrer, denying motions for nonsuit and directed verdict and the admission of certain evidence and refusing to strike the same, and contends that the evidence is insufficient to sustain the verdict.

Respondent was injured by contact with the side of a Studebaker automobile…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ex Parte DanielsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Mann v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  3. In Re MurphyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Atlas Mixed Mortar Co. v. City of BurbankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Flynn v. Bledsoe Co.California Court of Appeal · 1928

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Pipoly v. BensonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Pressman v. BarnesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1956
  3. Natural Milk Producers Ass'n v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Mecchi v. Lyon Van & Storage Co.California Court of Appeal · 1940
  5. Agnew v. City of Culver CityCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API