Legal Opinion

Martin v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided December 5, 2011No. 03-2272 TPublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DAMICH, Judge:

Pending in this AMCOR tax case is Plaintiffs’ motion for reconsideration, filed August 5, 2011, regarding certain limitations and penalty interest claims. In their motion, Plaintiffs first question whether these claims were reinstated when final judgment against them was vacated on July 1, 2008. If their claims were not reinstated, they question whether the decision in the test case on these claims, Prati v. United States, 81 Fed.Cl. 422 (2008) (“Prati I”), constitutes the law of the case in their ease. Even if their claims were dismissed based on the decisions in Prati,…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Henderson v. ShinsekiSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  2. United States v. Tohono O’odham NationSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  3. Duffie v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2010
  4. Cobell v. NortonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2004
  5. Hinck v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Haggart v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
  2. Jonathan L. Kaplan v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
  3. McCann v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
  4. Petro-Hunt, L.L.C. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
  5. Barry v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API