Legal Opinion

Poole v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 29, 1984No. 81-08408; CA A28966PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRichardson, P. J.

The main issue in this workers’ compensation case is whether the carrier is responsible for payment of claimant’s bills for chiropractic treatment. The Workers’ Compensation Board concluded that the condition for which claimant received the treatment did not result from his compensable injury and so the carrier is not responsible. We affirm.

Claimant, a draftsman, compensably injured his back in March, 1978, when he lifted some desk drawers. In August, 1980, he received an award of 20 percent permanent partial disability. Shortly before that, claimant had begun treatment with a chiropractor,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. McGarry v. State Accident Insurance FundCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
  2. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp. v. ForrestCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
  3. EBI Companies v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
  4. Kosanke v. State Accident Insurance FundCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Miller v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
  2. Anderson v. EBI CompaniesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
  3. Ellis v. McCall InsulationCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API