Lane v. Harborview Medical Center
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtAppelwick, J.
¶1 Lane appeals the order of summary judgment dismissing her claim against Harborview under the employee misclassification act, chapter 49.44 RCW. As a per diem nurse, Lane committed to work only a given four week period at a time. Harborview did not guarantee employment for that period or any period thereafter. A classified nurse makes a commitment to work a certain amount of hours per week on a permanent basis, and Harborview guarantees to that classified nurse that she will be scheduled and compensated for those hours. Be*283cause the commitments between Lane and the employer were objectively…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Folsom v. Burger KingWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- Folsom v. Burger KingWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- Grimwood v. University of Puget Sound, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1988
- Kilian v. AtkinsonWashington Supreme Court · 2002
- Central Washington Bank v. Mendelson-Zeller, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1989
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Keck v. CollinsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
- Marcus & Millichap Real Estate Investment Services of Seattle, Inc. v. Yates, Wood & MacDonald, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2016
- Lane v. HARBORVIEW MEDICAL CENTERCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
- In re the Estate of BlessingCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
- Citibank v. Daniel Peterson And Kristi PetersonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2021
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.