Legal Opinion

Lane v. Harborview Medical Center

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided February 1, 2010No. 61774-5-IPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAppelwick, J.

¶1 Lane appeals the order of summary judgment dismissing her claim against Harborview under the employee misclassification act, chapter 49.44 RCW. As a per diem nurse, Lane committed to work only a given four week period at a time. Harborview did not guarantee employment for that period or any period thereafter. A classified nurse makes a commitment to work a certain amount of hours per week on a permanent basis, and Harborview guarantees to that classified nurse that she will be scheduled and compensated for those hours. Be*283cause the commitments between Lane and the employer were objectively…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Folsom v. Burger KingWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Folsom v. Burger KingWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Grimwood v. University of Puget Sound, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Kilian v. AtkinsonWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Central Washington Bank v. Mendelson-Zeller, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1989

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Keck v. CollinsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
  2. Marcus & Millichap Real Estate Investment Services of Seattle, Inc. v. Yates, Wood & MacDonald, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2016
  3. Lane v. HARBORVIEW MEDICAL CENTERCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
  4. In re the Estate of BlessingCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
  5. Citibank v. Daniel Peterson And Kristi PetersonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2021

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API