Legal Opinion

Uva v. Alonzy

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided January 5, 1933PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHaines, J.

The stipulation of facts discloses that the plaintiff’s decedent, Joseph Uva, was in the employ of the city of Stamford and the contract of employment came within the provisions of the Workmen’s Compensation Act. Uva was struck by an automobile driven negligently by the defendant" and died as a result five days later. The record contains a stipulation by all parties to this action for a judgment of $5750 against the defendant. It appears that the decedent and the plaintiff administratrix though never married had lived together in the relation of husband and wife from 1907 to the date of his…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. City of Grand Rapids v. CrockerMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Palumbo v. George A. Fuller Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1923
  3. Kling v. TorelloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1913
  4. Dettloff v. Hammond, Standish & Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Simmons v. HolcombSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1923

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Mickel v. New England Coal & Coke Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1946
  2. Stavola v. PalmerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1950
  3. Shaker v. ShakerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1942
  4. Enquist v. General DatacomSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
  5. Olszewski v. State Employees' Retirement CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1957

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API