Snyder v. City of Alliance
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
SHERICK, PJ.
The proponent of this suit bases his right to the relief claimed upon the argument that his mint vending machine is not a gambling device per se, and this being true, there exists therein a property right of which he cannot be deprived without due process of law, and that therefore, upon the agreed facts, that this, a court of equity, should afford injunctive relief.
There can be no question but that in proper case a court of chancery may grant relief where police officers act without authority, or abuse an authority sought to be exercised; but as a general proposition.it may be'…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Gaither v. CateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1929
- Soper v. MichalCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1914
3Cited by14 opinions
- Garono v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- State v. WileySupreme Court of Iowa · 1942
- Middlemas v. StrutzNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1941
- State v. BaitlerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1932
- Troy Amusement Co. v. AttenweilerOhio Court of Appeals · 1940
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.