Legal Opinion

Gaither v. Cate

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided January 16, 1929No. [No. 63, October Term, 1928.]PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDigges, J.

The appellee in this case is the owner of a hundred machines by which certain confections or mints are delivered to patrons upon the placing of a nickel in a slot at the upper part of the machine. In addition to the mechanism which results in the sale of a package of mints for five cents, the machine has a certain other mechanical contrivance which does other things which will be later referred to more particularly. The police commissioner of Baltimore City gave instructions to seize the- machines of the appellee and all other similarly constructed and operated machines in Baltimore City.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Long v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1891
  2. State v. HawkinsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1902
  3. Long v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1891

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. State v. Crescent Cities Jaycees Foundation, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
  2. Kraus v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1939
  3. People v. One Pinball Machine Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1942
  4. Painter v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1932
  5. State v. WileySupreme Court of Iowa · 1942

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API