Legal Opinion

Middlemas v. Strutz

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided August 1, 1941No. File No. 6778PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBurke, J.

Plaintiff brought this action in the district court of Burleigh county to recover possession of a device commonly referred to as a pin ball machine which had been seized by the defendant attorney general as a gambling apparatus. The judgment of the district court was in favor of the defendant and plaintiff has appealed from the judgment. All of the facts were stipulated at the trial of the case and the sole issue upon this appeal is whether operation or possession of the machine in suit is violative of North Dakota statutes prohibiting lotteries, gambling and the possession of gámbling…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Rankin v. Mills Novelty Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1930
  2. Adams v. AkerlundIllinois Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Snyder v. City of AllianceOhio Court of Appeals · 1931

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. WileySupreme Court of Iowa · 1942
  2. Gayer v. WhelanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  3. Downing v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  4. State v. One Hundred & Fifty-Eight Gaming DevicesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
  5. Pepple v. HeadrickIdaho Supreme Court · 1942

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API