Legal Opinion

Balogh v. City of Flat Rock

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided September 26, 1985No. Docket 69747PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiff Balogh began these proceedings to enjoin the City of Flat Rock from enforcing its ordinances pertaining to fishing, wading, and boating in the Huron River where it passes through the city. Defendant Huron Clinton Metropolitan Authority was added as a party defendant because plaintiff also sought portage around the Flat Rock Dam, which is owned by the authority. Plaintiff Balogh arrived at a consent judgment with the city, terminating his involvement in the case,_

At some point, the State of Michigan, through its Attorney General and the Department of Natural Resources, joined as…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. General Motors Corp. v. ErvesMichigan Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Kahn-Reiss, Inc. v. Detroit & Northern Savings & Loan Ass'nMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. City of Livonia v. Department of Social ServicesMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. Village of Grosse Pointe Woods v. Village of St. Clair ShoresMichigan Supreme Court · 1949

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Wodogaza v. H & R Terminals, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. Lopus v. L & L Shop-Rite, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1988
  3. Williams v. Litton Systems, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1987
  4. MacKe Laundry Service Co. v. OvergaardMichigan Court of Appeals · 1988
  5. Department of Transportation v. PichalskiMichigan Court of Appeals · 1988

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API