Legal Opinion

Department of Transportation v. Pichalski

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided March 1, 1988No. Docket 88379, 88380, 88381PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiff appeals as of right the trial court’s orders concerning defendants’ right to interest and attorney fees following these consoli dated condemnation proceedings. Defendants cross-appeal. We affirm in part and reverse and remand in part.

This dispute involves three parcels which extend approximately 180 feet past the south side of Ford Road or M-153. Plaintiff sought to acquire the front sixty feet of these parcels. Defendants claim that plaintiff prepared appraisals concerning their lands. Parcel C-llll (defendants Pichalski, Coshatt and Batshon) was appraised at $43,400; parcel C-1112…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kohn v. Ford Motor Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. State Highway Commission v. DavisMichigan Court of Appeals · 1972
  3. Balogh v. City of Flat RockMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. Department of Transportation v. DiMatteoMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. Department of Transportation v. JorissenMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Lenawee County v. WagleyMichigan Court of Appeals · 2013
  2. City of Flint v. PatelMichigan Court of Appeals · 1993
  3. Department of Transportation v. RobinsonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. City of Detroit v. J Cusmano & Son, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1989
  5. Hughes v. Park Place Motor Inn, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1989

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API