Legal Opinion
H. E. Briggs & Co. v. Harper Clay Products Co.
Washington Supreme Court
Decided December 13, 1928No. 21464. Department TwoPublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.
On October 31,1927, in the case of H. E. Briggs & Co., plaintiff, v. Harper Clay Products Co., defendant, receivers were appointed for the defendant by the superior court for King county, looking to the liquidation of its affairs because of its insolvency. William E. Grant filed in the receivership proceedings his claim against Harper Clay Products Co., claiming it to be indebted to him in the sum of $9,343. This claim was allowed by the receivers as a valid indebtedness against the assets of the receivership.
Thomas S. Lippy filed in the receivership proceedings his claim against the Harper…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Berkey v. Third Avenue Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1926
- Erkenbrecher v. GrantCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Platt v. Bradner Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1924
- First National Bank v. WaltonWashington Supreme Court · 1928
- Westland v. Post Land Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1921
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Kueckelhan v. Federal Old Line InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1966
- Albert Richards Co. v. Mayfair, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
- Hoffman Wall Paper Co. v. City of HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
- Superior Portland Cement, Inc. v. Pacific Coast Cement Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1949
- Bellaire Securities Corp. v. BrownSupreme Court of Florida · 1936
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.