Legal Opinion

First National Bank v. Walton

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 12, 1928No. Nos. 20822, 20823. Department OnePublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.

The plaintiffs, Seattle and Everett banks, separately, on the same day, commenced these actions in the superior court for Skagit county, seeking recovery from the defendant, Clear Lake Sales Corporation, upon certain promissory notes evidencing a separate indebtedness owing by it to each of the banks in an amount of approximately $43,000. The interveners, Walton and Moody, as receivers of the insolvent Clear Lake Lumber Company, by their separate complaints, intervened in each of the actions; being permitted to do so by orders of the court, upon the theory that the lumber company and the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Berkey v. Third Avenue Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1926
  2. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. Minneapolis Civic & Commerce Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  3. United States v. Reading Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1920
  4. Erkenbrecher v. GrantCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Platt v. Bradner Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1924

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Southern Electrical Supply Co. v. Raleigh County National BankWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Southern States Cooperative, Inc. v. DaileyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Sommer v. Yakima Motor Coach Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Divco-Wayne Sales Financial Corp. v. Martin Vehicle Sales, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1963
  5. In Re Fox West Coast TheatresCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1937

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API