Legal Opinion

Platt v. Bradner Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 5, 1924No. 18745PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.

A motion, made and argned in- the briefs to dismiss the appeal on the ground that one of the interested parties bound by the judgment was not served with notice of appeal, is denied, since the record has been supplemented to show that the ground of the motion is unfounded.

The action is one by a dairy farmer, suing in his own behalf and as assignee, for the purpose of collection, of sixteen other dairymen in the vicinity of Issa-quah, Tolt, Redmond, and Snoqualmie, to recover on seventeen causes of action aggregating the sum of $2,-130.40. The action was brought against The Bradner Company, a…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Luckenbach S. S. Co. v. W. R. Grace & Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1920
  2. Clere Clothing Co. v. Union Trust & Savings BankCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1915
  3. Hunter v. Baker Motor Vehicle Co.District Court, N.D. New York · 1915
  4. Oregon Eilers Music House v. SittonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1921
  5. Spokane Merchants Ass'n v. Clere Clothing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1915

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. National Labor Relations Board v. Deena Artware, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. Kueckelhan v. Federal Old Line InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Weisser v. Mursam Shoe CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
  4. Gatecliff v. Great Republic Life InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Harrison v. PugaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1971

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API