Legal Opinion

Oakes v. Wooten

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided October 4, 2005No. COA04-1174PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUNTER, Judge.

Margaret Talley Wooten (“Wooten”) and Steven Edward Wooten (“Steven”) (collectively “defendants”) appeal from a judgment entered 15 September 2003 consistent with a jury verdict finding defendants negligent, and from an order entered 23 January 2004 awarding costs and attorneys’ fees. For the reasons stated within, we reverse the trial court’s award of attorneys’ fees and costs to plaintiffs pursuant to Rule 37 and award of certain costs pursuant to N.C. Gen. Stat. § 6-20, and affirm as to all other issues.

The evidence presented tended to show that on 6 November 1999, Ray Allen…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Lutz Industries, Inc. v. Dixie Home StoresSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  2. City of Charlotte v. McNeelySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  3. Gregory v. LynchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  4. West Construction Co. v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
  5. Millis Construction Co. v. Fairfield Sapphire Valley, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Cail v. CerwinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
  2. Vaden v. DombrowskiCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
  3. KHOMYAK EX REL. KHOMYAK v. MeekCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
  4. Hoffman v. OakleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
  5. Priest v. Safety-Kleen Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API