Legal Opinion

Hoffman v. Oakley

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided July 17, 2007No. COA06-932PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GEER, Judge.

Plaintiff Paula Ann Hoffman and her daughter, third-party defendant Catherine Michelle Hoffman (the “Hoffmans”), appeal from a judgment in favor of defendants/third-party plaintiffs, Shawn Cherri Oakley and David Reade Oakley, entered in accordance with a jury verdict, concluding that Catherine Michelle Hoffman had been con-tributorily negligent in an automobile collision. The primary issue on appeal is whether the trial court erred by admitting the testimony of the defendant/third-party plaintiffs’ accident reconstruction expert, which, the Hoffmans contend, constituted improper…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Ruark Obstetrics & Gynecology Associates, P.A.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
  2. Smith v. PriceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  3. Aspen v. BaylessSupreme Court of Florida · 1990
  4. West Construction Co. v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
  5. Snead v. HollomanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Weiland v. BumannSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2025
  2. Blackwell v. HatleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
  3. Corbett v. GrayCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
  4. Hoffman v. OakleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 2007
  5. LOGAN VS. ABENevada Supreme Court · 2015

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API