Eberle Tanning Company v. United States
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
HERMAN, District Judge.
The matter before the court is the defendant’s “Motion for Judgment Notwithstanding the Verdict and a New Trial, or in the Alternative for a New Trial on all Issues.” The motion will be denied.
Plaintiff, Eberle Tanning Company, paid under protest an accumulated earnings tax for the fiscal years ending on October 31st 1964 and October 31st, 1965, in the amounts of $120,656.93 and $80,915.48, respectively and then sought in this suit a refund of the tax so paid, plus interest. The applicable provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954 are Sections…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Mroz v. Dravo Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
- R. Gsell & Co., Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
- Electric Regulator Corporation v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1964
- Cage v. New York Central Railroad CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1967
- Mroz v. Dravo CorporationDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1968
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Smith v. Pressed Steel Tank Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1975
- Whittle v. SchemmDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1975
- Grob, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1983
- A. F. Gallun & Sons Corp. v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1981
- Celotex Corp. v. United Steelworkers of AmericaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1974