Legal Opinion
Smith v. Pressed Steel Tank Co.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided February 20, 1975No. Civ. A. Nos. 69-361, 69-509PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
BRODERICK, District Judge.
This matter is presently before the Court on the plaintiffs’ Motion for a New Trial. After carefully considering the grounds urged by the plaintiffs in support of their motion for a new trial, the Court has determined that it must deny the motion.
The plaintiffs, both long-term employees of the defendant companies, Pressed Steel Tank Co. and Aqua-Chem, Inc., brought separate actions seeking to recover from the defendants for respiratory ailments allegedly caused and/or aggravated by fumes and dust prevalent in the defendants’ industrial plant while…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Edward C. Denneny and Catherine Denneny v. Bernard Siegel, Louis H. Block and the Albert Einstein Medical CenterCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1969
- Menarde v. Philadelphia Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
- Armando A. Miranda v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1958
- United States v. James Allen HiblerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972
- McMahon v. YoungSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Pate v. Seaboard RailroadCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
- Lewis v. Seaboard RailroadCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1987
- Jacobson v. LeonardDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1976
- McConney v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1978
- Smith v. Pressed Steel Tank CoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.