Legal Opinion
Whittle v. Schemm
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided November 3, 1975No. Civ. A. 73-1846PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
BRODERICK, District Judge.
Defendants Knudsen Trucking, Inc. and Gordon J. Schemm have moved the Court for a judgment notwithstanding .the verdict and for a new trial. After carefully considering all the grounds urged by the defendants, the Court has determined that it must deny the motions.
This action for personal injuries was tried in November, 1974 and resulted in a jury verdict in favor of plaintiffs James and Mary Whittle and their son, Richard, against defendants Schemm and Knudsen, and in favor of defendant Lorenzo Guistino. The suit arose out of a motor vehicle…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Kuisis v. Baldwin-Lima-Hamilton Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Whitner v. LojeskiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
- Kline v. Moyer and AlbertSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
- FLICKINGER ESTATE v. RitskySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Lawrence B. Thomas, and Cross-Appellant v. E. J. Korvette, Inc., and Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1973
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Overstreet v. Shoney's, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1999
- Marks v. Mobil Oil Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1983
- Meyer ex rel. Meyer v. StoneCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1981
- Whittle v. SchemmCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
- Grainy v. CampbellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.