Celotex Corp. v. United Steelworkers of America
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
BECHTLE, District Judge.
The Celotex Corporation (“Celotex”) commenced this action under § 301 of the Taft-Hartley Act, 29 U.S.C. § 185, against the International Union of District 50, Allied Technical Workers of the United States and Canada (“International”) and Local 12829 (“Local”), to recover damages sustained as a result of the breach of a no-strike clause contained in the collective bargaining agreement entered into by the above-captioned parties. 1 The case proceeded to a bifurcated trial before a jury of eight. After the International and the Local were both found…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners of America v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Twin City Plaza, Inc. v. Central Surety And Insurance CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1969
- Lux Art Van Service, Inc., a California Corporation v. Art PollardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1965
- Eazor Express, Inc. v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1973
- Eberle Tanning Company v. United StatesDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1972
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- RingCentral, Inc. v. Nextiva, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2020