Legal Opinion
O'Neal v. Harper
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided November 2, 1937No. 27397PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHurst, J.
This is an action by Mrs. M. C. O’Neal to cancel and set aside a mineral deed convejnng an undivided one-half interest in the oil and gas royalty covering approximately 110 acres owned by plaintiff. The deed bears date January 5, 1935, and the defendant, W. R. Harper, was the grantee.
Plaintiff in her petition alleged that the defendant made certain misrepresentations regarding the value of her land for oil and gas purposes and 'agreed to pay her $110 for one-half interest in the royalty, but that upon execution and delivery of the deed the defendant gave plaintiff a check for the sum of $55…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Minneapolis & St. Louis Railway v. Columbus Rolling MillSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Atwood v. RoseSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Crowe v. . LewinNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
- Dulany v. RogersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1879
- Frazer v. State BankSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1911
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- People v. SyrieSupreme Court of Colorado · 2004
- Watkins v. Grady County Soil & Water Conservation DistrictSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1968
- Harrell v. NashSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
- Maynard v. TaylorSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
- Continental Insurance v. PortwoodSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.