Legal Opinion

People v. Rainey

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 14, 1964No. Crim. 8792PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShinn, P. J.

Sue May West and Herbert Rainey were jointly accused of perjury (count I), conspiracy to commit perjury (count II), and conspiracy to falsely report a crime in violation of section 148.5 of the Penal Code (count III). Rainey was accused of subornation of perjury (count IV), and both defendants were charged with conspiracy to commit false imprisonment in violation of sections 182 and 236 of the Penal Code (count V). Rainey was accused of having suffered a prior conviction of robbery, which he admitted. Both were convicted upon all counts of the information. Rainey, hereinafter referred to as…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Neal v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  2. People v. McFarlandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  3. People v. KellerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  4. People v. FinchCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. In re WrightCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Pena v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
  3. People v. MorrisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  4. People v. LohmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  5. People v. McRaeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API