Legal Opinion

State v. Marchese

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided May 20, 1994No. S-93-123PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCaporale, J.

We, on our own motion, removed this postconviction relief action from the Nebraska Court of Appeals to this court in order to regulate the caseloads of the two tribunals. The defendant-appellant, Joseph A. Márchese, having been convicted of second degree arson in violation of Neb. Rev. Stat. § 28-503 (Reissue 1989), asserts that the postconviction court erred in failing to grant him an evidentiary hearing in order that he might show, among other things, that his plea of guilty was the result of the ineffective assistance of his attorney. We reverse the judgment of the district court and…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Cuyler v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Holloway v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Victor v. NebraskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. State v. WilliamsNebraska Supreme Court · 1986

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. State v. BjorklundNebraska Supreme Court · 2000
  2. State v. DunsterNebraska Supreme Court · 2001
  3. State v. BecerraNebraska Supreme Court · 1998
  4. State v. EhlersNebraska Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Kraemer Brothers, Inc. v. Dane CountyCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1999

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API