Legal Opinion

Buffalo Specialty Co. v. Gougar

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided September 15, 1914No. 3902PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error to Denver District Court. Hon. Harry C. Riddle, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtBell, J.

*525This is the second action brought in the District Court of the City and County of Denver on a written obligation,- in the general form of a penal bond, executed by the defendants in error, as co-partners, to The Buffalo- Specialty Manufacturing Company, a corporation, of Buffalo, New York, and by it assigned to- The Buffalo' Specialty Company, a corporation organized and existing under and by virtue of the laws of the State of New York, plaintiff in error herein, and which obligation is in words and figures as follows:

“This agreement made and entered into- this 28th day of July, 1903, by land…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Blanchard v. SpragueU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1859

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Tart v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
  2. Steiner Sales Co. v. Schwartz Sales Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1938
  3. Hanson v. Hall Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1922
  4. Steiner Sales Co. v. Schwartz Sales Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API