Legal Opinion

Hanson v. Hall Manufacturing Co.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided December 15, 1922PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDe Grape, J.

This appeal involves a question of jurisdiction and nothing else. Did the cause of action- stated in the counterclaim to which the demurrer is addressed involve state or Federal jurisdiction? We think the case of American Well Works Co. v. Layne & Bowler Co. 241 U. S. 257 (60 L. Ed. 987) is controlling on the point in issue. Here, as there, the question depends upon the allegations upon which the cause of action is declared. Here, as there, the cause may be summed up in a few words.

Plaintiff alleges ownership in a certain United States pat*1214ent, the legal title to which was in the defendant…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. American Well Works Company v. Layne and Bowler CompanySupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  2. Pratt v. Paris Gas Light & Coke Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1897
  3. Hartell v. TilghmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  4. Dale Tile Manufacturing Co. v. HyattSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  5. David v. ParkMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Fowler v. Curtis Publishing Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1950
  2. Belcher v. LittleSupreme Court of Iowa · 1982
  3. Roach v. CrouchSupreme Court of Iowa · 1994
  4. Becher v. Contoure Laboratories, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1928
  5. L. A. Young Spring & Wire Corp. v. FallsMichigan Supreme Court · 1940

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API