Tart v. Walker
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
ARNOLD, Judge.
Plaintiff relies on the wording of his complaint to support his contention that this is a simple breach of contract action, with jurisdiction in the state courts. The complaint states in pertinent part:
4. The plaintiff and defendant entered into a partnership agreement dated January 1, 1973. On the same date a second agreement was entered into. The second agreement granted the partnership the right to manufacture a farm implement designed and invented by the plaintiff.
5. The second agreement mentioned in paragraph No. 4 above specifically stated that should the partnership…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Pratt v. Paris Gas Light & Coke Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Coleman v. . WhisnantSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
- Coleman v. WhisnantSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
- Odell v. F. C. Farnsworth Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Buffalo Specialty Co. v. GougarColorado Court of Appeals · 1914
3Cited by54 opinions
- Tubiolo v. Abundant Life Church, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
- Emory v. Jackson Chapel First Missionary Baptist ChurchCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
- Kamakazi Music Corp. v. Robbins Music Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1981
- Sperry Corp. v. PattersonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
- State Ex Rel. Cooper v. Seneca-Cayuga Tobacco Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.