Legal Opinion

McFadden v. Ross

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided December 17, 1890No. 14,472PublishedCited by 8 opinions

From the Shelby Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtOlds, C. J.

— This is an action by the appellees against the appellants upon a replevin bond. Trial by the court, without the intervention of a jury, and, on proper request, the court found the facts and stated its conclusions of law thereon. Exceptions by the appellants to the conclusions of law. Appellants also filed a motion for a new trial, which was overruled, and exceptions reserved.

Errors are assigned, that the court erred in its conclusions of law, and in overruling appellants’ motion for a new trial. The court found the facts to be : That on the 26th day of March, 1879, the defendant McFadden,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. O'Donald v. ConstantIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  2. Fisher v. SyfersIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  3. First National Bank v. CarterIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  4. Willis v. ThompsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1884

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. American Varnish Co. v. ReedIndiana Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Fuller & Fuller Co. v. MehlIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Hoesman v. ShefflerIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008
  4. Saint Joseph Hydraulic Co. v. WilsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Chicago, Indianapolis & Louisville Railway Co. v. JohnsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1910

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API