Legal Opinion

O'Donald v. Constant

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1882No. 8831PublishedCited by 31 opinions

From the Miami Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtWoods, J.

Assigning for error the overruling of his motion for a new trial, the appellant complains of the giving and refusing of instructions, and that the verdict is contrary to the law and the evidence.

Yo question in reference to instructions is properly presented. Copies of certain instructions appear in the transcript immediately following the motion for a new trial, and apparently as a part of the motion. If not a part of that motion, then it does not appear that they were filed, as the transcript contains no-copy of the clerk’s notation of the filing, nor any recital that they were filed.

It has…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Smith v. KylerIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Zehner v. AultmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  3. O'Connor v. CoatsIndiana Supreme Court · 1881

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Board of Education v. DaySupreme Court of Georgia · 1907
  2. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. WrightIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Landwerlen v. WheelerIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Elliott v. RussellIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  5. Johnson-Brinkman Commission Co. v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1895

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API