Umrein v. Nelson
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtVan Hoomissen, J.
This is the second time this declaratory judgment proceeding has been before us. In the first appeal, Umrein v. Topaz, 61 Or App 601, 658 P2d 568, rev den 294 Or 792 (1983), we affirmed the trial court’s judgment dismissing the action as to the City of Beaverton.
Plaintiff seeks a declaration that three projects undertaken by the Beaverton Urban Renewal Agency (BURA or Agency) are not authorized by the Beaverton Urban Renewal Plan (BURP or Plan) and that, therefore, defendants, the Board of Directors of the Agency, are personally liable under ORS 294.100 for any funds spent on those projects.1…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Port of Umatilla v. RICHMONDOregon Supreme Court · 1958
- City of Eugene v. JohnsonOregon Supreme Court · 1948
- Umrein v. TopazCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
3Cited by1 opinion
- Burt v. BlumenauerOregon Supreme Court · 1985