Legal Opinion

Burt v. Blumenauer

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 23, 1985No. TC A8112-07355; CA A25112; SC S30238PublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRoberts, J.

The issue is whether defendant public officials can be held personally liable for the return of public monies expended to promote water fluoridation during an election period when that issue was before the voters.

I. STATEMENT OF THE CASE

Plaintiff taxpayer sued three Multnomah County Commissioners, the county executive and two county health officers for unlawful expenditure of federal and matching county grant monies. The funds were used to pay salaries for persons, including one of the health officers, who staffed a “fluoridation public information project” and to hire advertising firms to…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. First Nat. Bank of Boston v. BellottiSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Abrams v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  3. Stanson v. MottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Planned Parenthood Ass'n v. Department of Human ResourcesOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Citizens, & C., Public Funds v. Bd. of Educ. Tp. of Parsippany-Troy HillsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1953

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. State v. HitzOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Smith v. DorseyMississippi Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Nelson v. Lane CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Cooper v. Eugene School District No. 4JOregon Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Vargas v. City of SalinasCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API