Legal Opinion

City of Eugene v. Johnson

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 16, 1948PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBailey, J.

This action was instituted by the City of Eugene to acquire, through the right of eminent domain, approximately 51 acres of land owned by defendants A. West Johnson and Elizabeth Y. Johnson, his wife. The complaint, after setting forth the corporate character of plaintiff and the marital status of defendants, alleges that the City of Eugene, by virtue of authority conferred by its charter, owns and operates, through its department of light and water, (1) a system of water works for the purpose of furnishing water to its citizens, and (2) an electric system for the generation and distribution…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Wilton v. County St. JohnsSupreme Court of Florida · 1929
  2. Southern Railway Co. v. City of MemphisTennessee Supreme Court · 1912
  3. City of Chicago v. LehmannIllinois Supreme Court · 1914
  4. City of New Orleans v. MoeglichSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1930
  5. Delfeld v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Moore Mill & Lumber Co. v. FosterOregon Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Port of Umatilla v. RICHMONDOregon Supreme Court · 1958
  3. State v. 0.62033 Acres of Land in Christiana HundredSuperior Court of Delaware · 1954
  4. Emerald People's Utility District v. PacificorpCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
  5. State Highway Commission v. Pacific Shore Land Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1954

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API