Legal Opinion

Penland v. French Broad Hospital, Inc.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided August 20, 1930PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConnor, J.

The case on appeal settled by the judge, upon disagreement of counsel, and certified to this Court on defendant’s appeal, O. S., 644, does not show that at the close of the evidence for the plaintiffs, defendant moved for judgment dismissing the action as of nonsuit, C. S., 567. When plaintiffs rested their case, defendant introduced evidence, and at the close of this evidence, plaintiffs introduced evidence in rebuttal. At the close of all the evidence, as shown by the case on appeal, defendant moved for judgment dismissing the action as of nonsuit “upon the ground that in no view of the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Nash v. . RoysterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  2. Barfield v. South Highlands InfirmarySupreme Court of Alabama · 1915
  3. Kelly v. Newark Shoe Stores Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  4. McCormick v. JonesWashington Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Johnson v. City Hospital Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1929

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Pendergraft v. RoysterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  2. Smith v. . Duke UniversitySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
  3. Pendergraft v. . RoysterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  4. Wilson v. Martin Memorial Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  5. Sykes Ex Rel. Sykes v. BlakeySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API