Legal Opinion

Waxham v. Smith

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 7, 1935No. 208PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stone

In this companion case to No. 102, Smith v. Snow, decided this day, ante, p. 1, certiorari was granted to review a decree of the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 70 F. (2d) 457, which affirmed the decree of the district court and held valid and infringed the first claim of the Smith Patent, No. 1,262,860, of April 16, 1918, for an improved apparatus and method for the incubation of eggs.

The issues here, as in the Snow case, are the scope of, Claim 1 and its infringement as rightly construed. For reasons stated at length in the opinion in the Snow case, our decision as to the scope of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Winans v. DenmeadSupreme Court of the United States · 1854
  2. Carnegie Steel Co. v. Cambria Iron Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1902
  3. Cochrane v. DeenerSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  4. Expanded Metal Co. v. BradfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
  5. Corning v. BurdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1854

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Gottschalk v. BensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Smith v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  3. Application of Charles D. Prater and James WeiCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1969
  4. Saco-Lowell Shops v. ReynoldsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1944
  5. Procter & Gamble Mfg. Co. v. Refining, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1943

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API