Legal Opinion
Trussell Mfg. Co. v. Wilson-Jones Co.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided June 29, 1931No. 353PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SWAN, Circuit Judge.
Both parties are manufacturers of loose-leaf devices, including loose-leaf binders of the ring type, in which the leaves are held in the binder by means of rings that are capable of being opened and closed and extend, when closed, through perforations in the marginal edges of the leaves. The patent in suit relates to a loose-leaf binder of the ring type, but the particular claims in litigation, claims 6, 7, and 8, have to do only with the cover and back-plate of the binder. Claim 6 reads as follows: “6. In a binder, a flexible cover having its back portion split on its…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Eibel Process Co. v. Minnesota & Ontario Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Seymour v. OsborneSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- Sessions v. RomadkaSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Coupe v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Dunlap v. SchofieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- General Electric Co. v. Wabash Appliance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Allied Wheel Products, Inc. v. RudeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1953
- Horvath v. McCord Radiator & Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1938
- Hazeltine Corporation v. Radio CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1937
- Levin v. CoeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1942
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.