Legal Opinion

Hawkins v. Medtronic, Inc.

District Court, E.D. California

Decided November 20, 2014No. Case No. 1:13-CV-00499 AWI SKOPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO STRIKE AND GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS

ANTHONY W. ISHII, Senior District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

Defendants MEDTRONIC, INC. and MEDTRONIC SOFAMOR DANEK USA, INC. bring motions to dismiss under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted and to strike allegedly redundant, immaterial, impertinent, or scandalous portions of Plaintiff GARY HAWKINS’ complaint under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(f). For'the reasons set forth below, Defendants’ motion to dismiss will…

2Cases cited57 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  4. Jena Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department Al Olsen, Police Chief, Individually and as a Police AgentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  5. Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Arthur v. Medtronic, Inc.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 2015
  2. Wright v. Medtronic, Inc.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 2015
  3. Glennen v. Allergan, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2016
  4. Markland v. Insys Therapeutics, Inc.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2017
  5. (PC) Young v. LeeDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API