Legal Opinion

Mount Laurel Township v. MiPro Homes, L.L.C.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided December 7, 2006Published

1Opinion of the Court

910 A.2d 617 (2006)

188 N.J. 531

MOUNT LAUREL TOWNSHIP, Plaintiff-Respondent,

v.

MiPRO HOMES, L.L.C., Defendant-Appellant, and

Lorraine C. Elbon and 190 Elbo, L.L.C., Defendants, and

Builders League of South Jersey, Inc., a New Jersey non-profit corporation, Defendant-Intervenor-Appellant.

Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued May 1, 2006.

Decided December 7, 2006.

Jeffrey I. Baron, Voorhees, argued the cause for appellant (Baron & Riefberg, attorneys; Mr. Baron and Barbara E. Riefberg, on the briefs).

Robert M. Washburn, Cherry Hill, argued the cause for intervenor-appellant (Flaster/Greenberg,…

Also in this document: Per curiam; Dissent.

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Sons of Thunder, Inc. v. Borden, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1997
  2. Furst v. Einstein Moomjy, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2004
  3. Furst v. Einstein Moomjy, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2004
  4. City of Trenton v. LenznerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1954
  5. City of Newark v. New Jersey Turnpike AuthoritySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1951

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API