Legal Opinion
Furst v. Einstein Moomjy, Inc.
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided November 15, 2004PublishedCited by 81 opinions
1Opinion of the Court 1
860 A.2d 435 (2004)
182 N.J. 2
Henry F. FURST, Plaintiff-Respondent,
v.
EINSTEIN MOOMJY, INC., The Carpet Department Store, and Walter Moomjy, Defendants-Appellants.
Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Argued September 13, 2004.
Decided November 15, 2004.
Bruce H. Nagel, Livingston, argued the cause for appellants (Nagel Rice & Mazie, attorneys).
Leon Grauer, Nutley, argued the cause for respondent.
2Opinion of the Court · AlbinJustice Albin
In this case, defendants, a carpet department store and its president, sold plaintiff-customer a defective carpet at a warehouse clearance sale in violation of the Consumer Fraud Act, N.J.S.A. 56:8-1 to -20. The…
3Cases cited25 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- City of Riverside v. RiveraSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Dolores J. Copeland, Individually and on Behalf of the Class of All Others Similarly Situated v. F. Ray Marshall, Secretary of LaborCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
- Pennsylvania v. Delaware Valley Citizens' Council for Clean AirSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by81 opinions
- Bosland v. Warnock Dodge, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2009
- Thiedemann v. Mercedes-Benz USA, LLCSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2005
- Anthony D'agostino v. Ricardo Maldonado (068940)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2013
- Litton Industries, Inc. v. IMO Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2009
- State v. JenewiczSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2008
76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.