Legal Opinion
City of Trenton v. Lenzner
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided November 22, 1954PublishedCited by 78 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Jacobs, J.
The Appellate Division affirmed the summary judgment for the plaintiff which had been entered in the Law Division. See City of Trenton v. Lenzner, 29 N. J. Super. 514 (App. Div. 1954). We granted certification under R. R. 1 .10-2.
Trenton’s parking problem is a serious one and has been the subject of much concern amongst its officials and citizens. In 1948 its board of commissioners adopted an ordinance which, after setting forth that congested street parking was threatening irreparable loss in valuations and was inimical to the general…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- United States Ex Rel. Tennessee Valley Authority v. PowelsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Kimball Laundry Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Mitchell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Banner Milling Co. v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
- McSorley v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by78 opinions
- State v. SilverSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1983
- NJ Highway Authority v. J. & F. HOLDING CO.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
- Woolley v. State Highway CommissionWyoming Supreme Court · 1963
- Township of West Orange v. 769 Associates, L.L.C.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2002
- Port of NY Authority v. HowellNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.