Legal Opinion

State v. Fouse

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided August 22, 1984No. 83-2047PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtScott, C.J.

The State of Wisconsin appeals from an order which forfeited an automobile to the state, pursuant to sec. 161.55, Stats., but which also required the state to reimburse John and Lucy Taylor for a $7,000 un-perfected interest in the car. This case requires us to construe and harmonize certain provisions of sec. 161.55, specifically, sec. 161.55(1) (d)4 relating to the rights of holders of a “perfected security interest” and sec. 161.55 (3) concerning the rights of “innocent persons” in for feiture actions. The state urges us to construe these provisions so that the “innocent persons” referred…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. County of Columbia v. BylewskiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  2. State v. Automatic Merchandisers of America, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
  3. State v. SchallerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
  4. State v. Consolidated Freightways Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Central National Bank of Wausau v. DustinCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1982

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. West Virginia Department of Transportation, Division of Highways v. RobertsonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Jones v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Gottsacker v. MonnierWisconsin Supreme Court · 2005
  4. State v. DeanCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1991
  5. ECT International, Inc. v. ZwerleinCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1999

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API