Legal Opinion
Adams v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided July 12, 1963No. 66-59; No. 88-59; No. 157-59; No. 264-59; No. 405-59; No. 41-60; No. 155-60; No. 78-61; No. 211-61PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam :
These are suits by inspectors of the Border Patrol of the Immigration and Naturalization Service (and designated immigration patrol inspectors of that Service) for overtime pay alleged to be owing to them under the federal overtime pay legislation. The cases were referred to trial commissioner W. Ney Evans, pursuant to Buie 45 (a), for findings of fact and a recommendation for a conclusion of law. The commissioner has filed a report containing an opinion, proposed findings of fact, and a recommended conclusion of law. Each side has excepted to portions of the commissioner’s…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Gaines v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1962
- Albright v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
- Anderson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1956
- United States v. MyersSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Gibney v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1949
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- John Doe, on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- John Doe, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
- Baylor v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1972
- McQuown v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1972
- Bilello v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1966
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.