Legal Opinion
Roark v. Farmers Group, Inc.
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided April 5, 2007No. Nos. 26,400, 24,287PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FRY, Judge.
{1} This case is the consolidation of two appeals from two separate actions involving the same parties and the same dispute. At its most simple, the dispute is about insurance coverage. The first action was brought by First New Mexico Bank (Bank) against Gary Roark and Roark’s insurer, Farmers Insurance Company of Arizona and related parties (collectively, Farmers). After a default judgment against Roark, a jury resolved that case in favor of Farmers. Bank appealed the first action, arguing that the trial court erred in certain evidentiary rulings and in denying Bank’s…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Key v. Chrysler Motors Corp.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1996
- Kelly Inn No. 102, Inc. v. KapnisonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1992
- New Mexico Right to Choose/NARAL v. JohnsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1999
- Crutchfield v. New Mexico Department of Taxation & RevenueNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2004
- Coates v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1999
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Allen v. LeMasterNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2011
- H-B-S Partnership v. Aircoa Hospitality Services, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2007
- Los Chavez Cmty. Assn. v. Valencia Cnty.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2012
- Los Chavez Community v. Valencia CountyNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2012
- State v. MillerNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2008
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.